http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2007/01/26/china-angered-by-nanjing-massacre-film/ About newspapers and freedom of the written word Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:05:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2007/01/26/china-angered-by-nanjing-massacre-film/#comment-121807 Wed, 09 May 2007 22:11:46 +0000 http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2007/01/26/china-angered-by-nanjing-massacre-film/#comment-121807 Hi. I'm TAMAGAWABOAT from Japan. You are saying, "despite evidence presented at the postwar Tokyo war crimes tribunals..." I'm afraid to ask you a question, what kind of evidence to prove that Nanking Massacre happened? If you know it, let me know. I think there is not a evidence at all. It is ceratin that there are so many testimoies and Westerners testified so. However, to check the record of Tokyo Tribunal, 4 Westerners (John G. Magee, George Ashmore Fitch, Miner Searle Bates, and Robert O. Wilson) were summoned to this Tribunal and each of them testified. Do you know what they testified? All of them testified the same answer, "There were atrocities by Japanese soldiers...(Lawyer of Defence: How many times did you witness?)...I did not witness it, but I heard so." Testimony is testimony, not evidence. Testimony always requires inspectation and crediblity. There is the heated controversy regarding whether Nanking Massacre happened actually or not among historian groups. I'm appreciate if you could check the below bvideo...Thanks. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwqFOxmr2to Hi. I’m TAMAGAWABOAT from Japan.
You are saying, “despite evidence presented at the postwar Tokyo war crimes tribunals…” I’m afraid to ask you a question, what kind of evidence to prove that Nanking Massacre happened? If you know it, let me know. I think there is not a evidence at all. It is ceratin that there are so many testimoies and Westerners testified so. However, to check the record of Tokyo Tribunal, 4 Westerners (John G. Magee, George Ashmore Fitch, Miner Searle Bates, and Robert O. Wilson) were summoned to this Tribunal and each of them testified. Do you know what they testified? All of them testified the same answer, “There were atrocities by Japanese soldiers…(Lawyer of Defence: How many times did you witness?)…I did not witness it, but I heard so.” Testimony is testimony, not evidence. Testimony always requires inspectation and crediblity. There is the heated controversy regarding whether Nanking Massacre happened actually or not among historian groups.
I’m appreciate if you could check the below bvideo…Thanks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwqFOxmr2to

]]>