<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saudi prince changes Fox&#8217;s Paris riots coverage</title>
	<link>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/14/saudi-prince-changes-foxs-paris-riots-coverage/</link>
	<description>About newspapers and freedom of the written word</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: rams</title>
		<link>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/14/saudi-prince-changes-foxs-paris-riots-coverage/#comment-2109</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/14/saudi-prince-changes-foxs-paris-riots-coverage/#comment-2109</guid>
					<description>I've no sympathy for either Fox news or Saudi Arabia Wahabites, but the Paris Riots were certainly  &quot;civil riots&quot;, not &quot;Muslim riots&quot;. Maybe you could call them &quot;nihilistic riots&quot; in a sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve no sympathy for either Fox news or Saudi Arabia Wahabites, but the Paris Riots were certainly  &#8220;civil riots&#8221;, not &#8220;Muslim riots&#8221;. Maybe you could call them &#8220;nihilistic riots&#8221; in a sense.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jens H</title>
		<link>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/14/saudi-prince-changes-foxs-paris-riots-coverage/#comment-1911</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/14/saudi-prince-changes-foxs-paris-riots-coverage/#comment-1911</guid>
					<description>It's good to have money - Also if you are a muslim.
I guess this story is linked somewhat to the story about Pentagon spending $300 millons on probaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to have money - Also if you are a muslim.<br />
I guess this story is linked somewhat to the story about Pentagon spending $300 millons on probaganda.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
