<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspapers format for mobile devices introduced in Asia</title>
	<link>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/06/15/newspapers-format-for-mobile-devices-introduced-in-asia/</link>
	<description>About newspapers and freedom of the written word</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/06/15/newspapers-format-for-mobile-devices-introduced-in-asia/#comment-351</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/06/15/newspapers-format-for-mobile-devices-introduced-in-asia/#comment-351</guid>
					<description>I've never seen one mobile device that can substitute a good broad sheet. They're too fiddly, screens are small requiring sharp site, bandwidth too slow etc... Papers only cost a few pence/cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen one mobile device that can substitute a good broad sheet. They&#8217;re too fiddly, screens are small requiring sharp site, bandwidth too slow etc&#8230; Papers only cost a few pence/cents.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jacob BÃ¸tter</title>
		<link>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/06/15/newspapers-format-for-mobile-devices-introduced-in-asia/#comment-223</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/06/15/newspapers-format-for-mobile-devices-introduced-in-asia/#comment-223</guid>
					<description>Why don't they just comply with the webstanards and keep presentation and content apart? That would make it even easier and not cost any software-licence at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they just comply with the webstanards and keep presentation and content apart? That would make it even easier and not cost any software-licence at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
